Cost-Reducing Healthcare Real Estate Strategy

By Nelson Udstuen, President, Healthcare Division

Healthcare real estate decisions often happen too late. A lease is nearing expiration. A practice is outgrowing its space. A new opportunity appears. At that point, the response becomes reactive.

In today’s market, that approach creates risk. It limits options, increases costs, and forces decisions that do not align with long-term goals. Real estate is not a standalone transaction. It is a core business decision that affects how a practice grows, operates, and competes.

Many providers still treat real estate as a final step in the process. In practice, it should be part of early-stage business planning. The timing of a decision often determines the quality of the outcome, and that is where many practices lose leverage before they realize it.

What’s changing in the market

On the surface, the healthcare real estate market appears stable. Demand remains strong, and Houston continues to benefit from population growth and the sustained need for healthcare services. The Texas Medical Center anchors one of the largest healthcare ecosystems in the world, and the long-term fundamentals still support expansion.

However, beneath that stability, behavior is shifting. Decision-making is slowing. Large health systems are becoming more cautious with outpatient expansion, and projects that would have moved forward in prior years are now being paused, delayed, or reassessed. Budgets are tightening, and growth is being evaluated more carefully.

This shift carries real implications. Health systems tend to lead market activity by signaling where care will be delivered and which submarkets will grow. When they begin to slow down, independent providers take notice. As a result, expansion plans become more conservative, relocations are delayed, and more groups choose to renew in place rather than pursue new opportunities.

The market, therefore, presents a contradiction. Activity still exists, but conviction is lower. Deals are happening, but decisions take longer, and fewer providers are willing to move forward without a clear understanding of risk.

The real issue: a widening gap

At the center of this shift is a growing disconnect between revenue and cost.

Reimbursement pressure continues to reduce revenue per procedure as payer dynamics evolve. Providers are often receiving less for the same services than they did in prior years. At the same time, operating costs continue to rise across staffing, equipment, and supplies.

Real estate costs have not followed that same downward pressure. In many cases, they continue to rise or remain firm. Construction costs remain elevated, and buildout expenses are significant. Institutional ownership groups still require rent growth to meet investment expectations, which further reinforces pricing pressure.

Taken together, these factors create a widening gap. Practices are being asked to absorb higher occupancy costs while generating less revenue per patient encounter. This dynamic changes how decisions must be made. It also reduces the margin for error, since assumptions about growing into higher costs are less reliable than they were in prior cycles.

What happens when providers wait

This is where timing becomes critical. When real estate decisions are delayed, the outcome tends to follow a consistent pattern.

First, leverage decreases. The best options are no longer available, as quality spaces are often committed well in advance. With fewer viable alternatives, landlords gain negotiating strength.

Second, decisions become compromised. Practices may settle for locations that do not fully support patient access or referral patterns. Layouts may not align with operational needs, and buildouts may be rushed or scaled back due to cost constraints.

Third, growth becomes constrained. A practice may need additional space to support demand but lacks the time or capital to make a move. Renewal becomes the default outcome, even when it does not align with long-term goals.

A recent example illustrates this clearly. A growing practice needed to expand but began evaluating options only months before its lease expiration. By that point, available inventory did not align with its requirements, and construction timelines made relocation unrealistic. The result was a renewal at a higher cost, with no improvement in functionality or capacity.

Situations like this are common. They are not driven by poor decision-making, but by timing and the absence of early planning.

What strategic planning looks like

A strategic approach begins with time.

An 18- to 24-month planning window allows for a full market evaluation. It provides the opportunity to survey all viable options, understand pricing from both rent and construction perspectives, and create leverage in negotiations.

This extended timeline also supports better financial preparation. Buildout costs can be assessed in advance, capital requirements can be planned, and financing options can be explored without urgency. As a result, decisions are made with clarity rather than constraint.

At the same time, a longer planning horizon expands the range of solutions. A practice is not limited to a single type of space or submarket. Instead, it can evaluate medical office, retail, or hybrid environments based on how patients access care and how the practice operates.

Retail locations, for example, offer visibility and convenience, allowing patients to park directly in front of a suite and enter quickly. This model works well for certain specialties and patient behaviors. In contrast, medical office buildings may provide stronger referral networks and a more traditional clinical setting, sometimes at a different cost structure depending on location.

Strategic planning enables objective evaluation of these trade-offs. Rather than defaulting to what has worked in the past, providers can make decisions based on what best supports their current and future needs.

Ultimately, the goal is alignment. Location, layout, and cost structure should support patient growth, physician recruitment, and operational efficiency. When real estate decisions are made within that framework, they contribute to long-term performance rather than short-term necessity.

A shift from transactional to advisory

This environment requires a shift in approach. Healthcare providers do not need a transactional process. They need informed guidance.

Real estate represents a meaningful portion of a practice’s cost structure, often in the range of 8 to 15 percent. More importantly, it influences revenue, patient experience, and long-term viability. Decisions about space are directly tied to how a practice functions and grows.

A strategic approach requires a broader view. It involves understanding market conditions, patient demographics, payer mix, and how other providers are positioning themselves. It also requires evaluating not only where a practice is today, but where it needs to be in the future.

In addition, it requires awareness of market signals that are not always readily apparent. When large systems slow expansion, it affects where demand will concentrate. When leasing activity declines across major portfolios, it signals a shift in momentum. These indicators shape outcomes, even if they are not immediately obvious.

The role of an advisor is to bring this context into the decision-making process. The objective is not simply to present available space, but to help interpret the market and align real estate decisions with business strategy.

Key takeaway

Waiting reduces flexibility and increases cost. Early planning creates options and improves outcomes.

Healthcare providers who take a proactive approach to real estate decisions are better positioned to manage costs, support growth, and adapt to changing market conditions. When these decisions are approached strategically, they become a tool for long-term success rather than a reactive necessity.

Start the conversation early

If your practice is considering a lease renewal, relocation, or expansion, the most important step is to begin early.

A strategic review of your current lease, market conditions, patient base, and future goals provides clarity before decisions become urgent. With that clarity, providers can move forward with confidence, knowing their real estate strategy aligns with the broader direction of their practice.

What our Clients Say